By: Yaw Sarpong, Daily
Express
Mining
companies, operating in the country have rejected the initial Ground Rent
(concession rate) fee of GHc36.50 per acre, fixed by a committee, which was
tasked to review the fee.
Daily
Express gathered that the last time the rate was reviewed was in 1986. The rate
was then five thousand cedis (₵5000).
With
the redenomination of the cedi, that translates into 50Gp per square kilometer.
In an interview with Dr. Gad Akwensivie from
the Office of the Administrator of Stool Lands, he indicated that it was a big problem for the
mining firms in paying the 50Gp.
He
stated that the mining companies were finding it difficult in paying that
amount, simply because the firms were
raising a number challenges. But he indicated that their reasons were justifiable.
He
mentioned the cost the cheque booklet been more than fifty pesewas, the cost of
postage was also more than fifty pesewas, and they also argued that travelling
to Office of the Administrator of Stool Lands to pay was waste of time, as far
as the mining companies were concerned.
Dr.
Akwensivie disclosed this to Daily Express after training of Financial
Journalists on the extractive industry held in Koforidua in the Eastern region.
The training was organized by GIZ in partnership with Institute of Finance
Economic Journalists (IFEJ)
According
to him, ‘these together with other reasons were the main reason why the mining companies
did not find it wealthy to pay that concession rent.’
However,
the land owners were agitating as to why a mining company will pay 50Gp per a
square kilometer.
“Because
of the concerns of the land owners, a committee was formed, comprising a number
of institutions including the Minerals Commission, Ministry of Finance, the Land
Division of Lands Commission, the Land Valuation Division of Lands Commission,
and the Office of the Administrator of the Stool Lands,’ said Dr. Akwensivie.
This
committee revised the rent from 50Gp to GHc36.50 per acre. This GHc36.50 per
acre translate to about GHc9,016 per square kilometer. The mining companies
felt this was on the higher side and they petition the sector minister to
reject this new rate and asked for a review.
‘In
fact one of their concerns was the fact that we failed to involve them before coming
up with the rate. So we invited them together with the small scale miners,
large scale miners to another meeting, which eventually looked at the rate
again,’ he added.
After
the meeting, the committee made proposals to the Minister of Finance, proposing
at least half or two-third of GHc36.50 per acre. ‘We hoping that this new rate
will reflect in the Fees and Charges Amendment Legislation that is currently
before Parliament,’ he said.
‘We
are hoping that subsequently, the mining companies will pay the new agreed fee.
However, the proposals indicate that the proposed rate will take retrospective
effect,’ Dr. Akwensivie explained.
This
means that the mining companies will pay for the whole 2012, 2013, and as well
as pay for 2014.
The
committee also proposed that this rate should be subject to review every three
years.
Daily
Express was told that the mining companies were happy and hoping to honour
their obligation.
Dr.
Akwensivie said the reason why they have to review the rate is the fact that,
small scale miners for a long time have been out of the rent net.
He
said, ‘small scale miners don’t pay corporate tax, they don’t pay ground rent,
they don’t pay mineral royalties and a lot of the statutory fees within the
mining sector.’
‘So
at that meeting, they were particularly interested in getting their members on
board, and only way to get the members on board was to get the rate within
their capabilities. We took that into consideration, and we hope that once we
get them on board and have a very good data base of small scale miners, and we
know where they are and where their offices are, subsequently we can decide to
adjust the rate with their consent, because this is principle about tax,’ he
noted.
‘What
is the point in charging very exorbitant tax where people cannot pay? It will
be in the best interest of this country to have a rate that people can pay.
More people paying taxes, that results in better mobilization of good revenue,’
he emphasized.
Comments
Post a Comment