Skip to main content

SSNIT to remove HFC board members



Two independent members of the Board of Directors of HFC Bank have charged the bank to take appropriate actions with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), on allegations of ‘insider trading’ by the Republic Bank of Trinidad and Tobago (RBTT), before the process of a mandatory takeover of HFC Bank proceeds.
According to them, this is to forestall any possible legal action against the directors of the bank on their duty of care and due diligence, because ‘insider trading’ is a criminal offence.
Mrs. Muriel Edusei and Mr. Francis Koranteng, the two non-executive independent directors whose removal from the board of HFC Bank is being pursued by SSNIT, raised the above concern in separate statements over the weekend.
The statements were occasioned by a letter signed by the Director General of SSNIT, Mr. Ernest Thompson and addressed to the Board Chairman of HFC Bank last October, expressing apprehension about the composition of the board.
Subsequently, SSNIT has requisitioned for an Extraordinary General Meeting (EGM) of the bank to be held on Tuesday January 20, 2015 to remove and replace the directors.
According to the statements, the EGM has been necessitated by the desire of SSNIT and Republic Bank to have Prof. Joshua Alabi, the SSNIT appointee, who also happens to be the chairman of the SSNIT board, appointed as chairman of the HFC Bank board; a position not backed by any law or the HFC Company regulations.
They noted that even though appointees of SSNIT had been on the board of HFC Bank since its inception, SSNIT did not appear to have had any problem with the composition of the board until a few months ago. Yet, no reason was assigned for the removal of the two directors, even though they deny any wrong doing, the statements noted.
They have therefore challenged SSNIT to tell the shareholders of the bank what aspects of the directors’ duties and responsibilities had been breached to necessitate their removal.
“It is the right of shareholders to appoint and remove Directors. This right is unfortunately being abused by SSNIT. It is also the right of a Director, especially an independent Director, to dissociate him/herself from actions by any shareholders which could lead to criminal liability for the Director.
“As you are well aware it does not lie within the powers of the Board to remove directors appointed by you, shareholders”.
They claimed the move by SSNIT sought to prevent further requests for investigations into the alleged ‘insider trading’ against RBTT.
The statements explained that because directors carry civil and criminal liability for false statements, there was the need to be cautious, and ensure that the allegation of ‘insider trading’ by Republic Bank was fully investigated and resolved.
They said while the Republic Bank was desperate not to have the insider trading allegation against them investigated, their moves, with the collaboration of SSNIT, to remove the two directors from the board was “indeed puzzling”.
“This ‘sword of Damocles’ was a clear act to intimidate directors to vote for the SSNIT appointee”, stated Mrs. Edusei.
There are issues of alleged insider trading, a criminal offence, against RBTT which became a court matter between HFC Bank and RBTT. The Supreme Court recently upheld RBTT’s view that the complaint should first have been lodged with SEC and not at the court.  That issue remains unresolved.
The statements therefore cautioned the HFC Bank board not to turn a blind eye in view of shareholder interest, noting, it is duty bound to establish the truth of this allegation.
Meanwhile, SEC is expected to issue its report on the outcomes of investigations into alleged breaches lodged by two concerned shareholders, Mrs. Eudora Koranteng and Mr. Kwasi Asante, individually against RBTT.
Credit: HFC Bank

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Akuapem-Apirede to promote tourism

By: Fred Yaw Sarpong sarpong007@gmaail.com
The Chiefs and people of Akuapem-Apirede in the Okere Constituency of the Akuapem North Municipality have put in place strategic plans to promote tourist sites in the town.
Apiredehene, Nana Saforo Okoampah III told the Daily Express that their vision is to develop Apirede in a modern way.
“We want to have a modern society and environment. We are doing this on the basis of promoting tourism here,” he added.
According to the Apiredehene, it’s their plan to promote the historic sites and the geographical location of the community.
Apirede is one of the 17 towns that forms the Akuapem State and historically, it used to house the armours of the Akuapem State. The community is part of the Nifa division of Akuapem.
He stated that one of those things was called ‘Odosu’ (the war god for Okuapemhene). “The Chief Executioner in those days for Akuapem also came from Apirede and items that he used were also kept here,” he stated.
“These are a lot of things …

PIAC told to go to court to enforce recommendations

By: Fred Yaw Sarpong
sarpong007@gmail.com

The Public Interest and Accountability Committee (PIAC), the mandated body to monitor the use of Ghana’s oil revenues has been asked to go to court to seek strict compliance of the laws covering accountability of oil funds in the country.

According to Dr. Steve Manteaw, the Campaign Coordinator for ISODEC and a member of the PIAC , it’s time for PIAC as a body to consider going to court to compel institutions responsible for managing Ghana’s oil revenue to answers some questions concerning the expenditure of oil funds.

He pointed out that there are several recommendations made by the PIAC in its past reports on management of petroleum revenues, and a lot of these recommendations has received no positive response from the institutions concerned.

He disclosed this to the Daily Express at a three-day workshop on Interrogating the 2016 Semi Annual PIAC Report at Koforidua in the Eastern Region.

The workshop was organized by the Institute of Financ…

BoG shuts down two financial institutions

The Bank of Ghana has closed down two financial institutions in the country. This was after the central bank investigation revealed that the two companies were operating without approval.

The two companies were Agro Development Fund Services Limited (ADFSL) and Hebron Financial Investment Limited (HFIL).

The Daily Express gathered that the ADFSL was asked to stop operating after the central bank realized the institution had not been licensed to take deposit from the public.

A statement from BoG said the ADFSL continued to operate despite the orders from the Bank of Ghana. It however closed down ADFSL’s operation until further notice.

The Bank of Ghana said that the ADFSL is located at Asufufu, opposite the Sunyani Traditional Council in the Brong Ahafo region.

“The decision to close down ADFSL is in furtherance of section 20(2) (g) of the Banks and Specialized Deposit-Taking Institutions Act, 2016 (Act 930). Bank of Ghana has investigated ADFSL thoroughly and has concluded that its a…