By: Fred Yaw
Sarpong
The
Executive of the Ghana Journalists Association (GJA) is to meet the leadership
of the 30 TV3 workers who have been sacked by the management of the television
station.
The
General Secretary of GJA, Mr. Dave Agbenu said the meeting is to afford the
workers the opportunity to brief GJA on what exactly happened leading to the
termination of their appointments.
He
described the incident as surprising and unfortunate thing to happen at TV3.
According
to him, the basis upon which the management of the station dismissed the worker
is disturbing. “Dismissing the workers because they wore red attire to work in
protest of better conditions of services is quite disturbing.”
The
media professional body has criticized TV3 for failing to improve the condition
of its workers, which has lead to dismissal of some of them.
Ghana
Journalists Association (GJA) has criticized the decision by TV3 Network Limited
to dismiss over 30 of its workers for requesting improved conditions of
services.
A
letter from management of the station announcing the dismissal of the workers
read, “wearing red shirts on Wednesday 22nd February, 2017, tying doors of
offices with red fabric, writing of graffiti on the premises threatening
management and hoisting of a red flag on the company’s transmission on
Wednesday 22 February 2017 without authority from management.”
“Management
wishes to bring to your attention that these acts that you participated in
constituted industrial action which is a form of illegal strike and was aimed
at intimidating and coercing management.”
“This
conduct amounts to unfair labour practice, management considers your action as
participating in one form of illegal strike and also amounts to gross
misconduct aimed at disrupting the business of the company and bringing the
name of the company into disrepute. Based on the above violations management
has decided to summarily dismiss you from the service with immediate effect.”
Meanwhile,
some labour experts have described the TV3 action as unlawful and it has no
legal basis.
Comments
Post a Comment