Skip to main content

Telcos deny defaulting on Talk Tax

The Ghana Chamber of Telecommunications has denied allegations that telecom operators have deducted Communication Service Tax (CST) from customers but have not paid to government.

There have been several media publications over the past few weeks stating that mobile operators made CST, otherwise known as Talk Tax, deductions from customers, but have failed to pay them on to the Ghana Revenue Authority (GRA) as required by law.

The Telecom Chamber said “this information is incorrect.”

It therefore stated that even though the 6% talk tax was by law meant for customers to pay, each of the operators did not pass it on to their customers, so they continue to it to GRA on behalf of consumers.

However there is a contention between operators and the GRA over another 6% tax the GRA sought to place on termination rates they pay to each other based on where a call terminated.

Under the interconnect arrangement between telcos, when a call is made from one network to the other, the network from which the call was made is supposed to pay 4Gp for each minute of call to the network to which the call was made.

For instance, if MTN charges 12Gp per minute of call to a Tigo line, MTN is supposed to pay Tigo 4Gp out of that 12Gp because the call terminated on Tigo. In the same way if Tigo charges a customer 8.4Gp per minute of call to an MTN line, Tigo would also pay MTN 4Gp from the 8.4Gp.

The GRA contended that apart from the 6% talk tax on the 12Gp MTN charges, or the 8.4Gp Tigo charges, the two telcos are also supposed to pay another 6% talk tax on the 4Gp termination rate they paid to each other.

But the telcos also contended that the tax is called talk tax and not interconnect service tax; and for the fact that telcos are not consumers, they cannot be charged talk tax by virtue of receiving or rendering interconnect services to each other.

“The consumer still remains the original person who placed the call and paid 12Gp/8.4Gp of which 4Gp has been used to pay interconnect fee in order to help the subscriber complete his/her call on the other network,” the Telecoms Chamber said.

The telcos also pointed out that if the GRA held the position that operators were “consumers” of each other’s services it would amount to taxing twice the same revenue stream, and that was where the argument of the double taxation arose.

Based on the GRA’s double taxation arrangement, telcos paid 6% on interconnect revenues from 2008 till April 2011 and then petitioned the GRA, the Office of the President and the Vice-President to review the application of the law and revert it to the position intended by the law.

“Up until April 2011 operators paid CST of six percent on usage charges and a further six percent on interconnect revenues derived from those same usage charges,” the Chamber said, adding that the operators stopped paying the 6% on interconnect charges after their petition.

The Chamber explained that operators did not collect the CST on interconnect revenues from each other after April 2011 during the petition, so the allegations that the telcos have collected CST from consumers but have not paid to government is completed false.

When operators and GRA could not agree on a common interpretation of the law, they went to court for a judicial declaration that providing interconnect services did not make them consumers, and the court agreed with the telcos.

“The court therefore held that all the CST on interconnect revenues paid by and collected from operators by GRA between 2008 through March 2011 were illegal,” the Chamber said.

But the new CST Amendment Law recently passed by Parliament has brought back the 6% tax on interconnect fee and legalized it to enjoin telcos to pay 6% talk tax and another 6% on interconnect fees.


Popular posts from this blog

Deputy AG sues Facebooker over 'malicious' Ameri deal

The Deputy Attorney-General and Member of Parliament for Bolgatanga East, Mr Dominic Ayine has filed a defamation suit at an Accra High Court against a Facebook commentator, Evron Hughes.
In Mr Ayine’s statement of claim, sighted by Graphic Online, he accused Mr Hughes of defaming him in a post he authored and published on Facebook on December 21, 2015, titled “RE: AMERI TRANSACTION”.
According to the Deputy A-G, the “false and malicious” post has provoked “public disaffection” against him and exposed him to public ridicule and contempt.
Describing Mr Hughes as a “self-styled social media blogger and a social commentator”, Mr Ayine said the Facebook post had brought his hard-won reputation “as a respected politician, teacher and lawyer” into “hatred, ridicule, odium, discredit, contempt, opprobrium and reproach”.
The Deputy A-G said the “defamatory words” were authored with the sole intent to reduce him in the estimation of all right thinking Ghanaians, adding that he had received numerou…

PIAC told to go to court to enforce recommendations

By: Fred Yaw Sarpong

The Public Interest and Accountability Committee (PIAC), the mandated body to monitor the use of Ghana’s oil revenues has been asked to go to court to seek strict compliance of the laws covering accountability of oil funds in the country.

According to Dr. Steve Manteaw, the Campaign Coordinator for ISODEC and a member of the PIAC , it’s time for PIAC as a body to consider going to court to compel institutions responsible for managing Ghana’s oil revenue to answers some questions concerning the expenditure of oil funds.

He pointed out that there are several recommendations made by the PIAC in its past reports on management of petroleum revenues, and a lot of these recommendations has received no positive response from the institutions concerned.

He disclosed this to the Daily Express at a three-day workshop on Interrogating the 2016 Semi Annual PIAC Report at Koforidua in the Eastern Region.

The workshop was organized by the Institute of Financ…

Graphic Communication Group staffs petition GJA Election Dispute Adjudication Committee

Some staffs of the Graphic Communications Group have petition the Election Dispute Adjudication Committee of the Ghana Journalists Association (GJA) concerning their grievances covering issues affecting the association.
The staffs of the company seeks some clarification on the mandate of the current executives of the association.

Dear Sir,
We the undersigned write to place before you our grievances covering issues affecting the Ghana Journalist Association, and we hasten to add that our grievances are placed before you in furtherance of our constitutional duty under Article 11 (e) of the 2004 Constitution of the Ghana Journalists Association.
We first of all seek clarification on the mandate of the current executives of the Association to be in office and take decisions to affect the wellbeing and welfare of the Associ…