By
Fred Yaw Sarpong
Ghana received a partial score of 63, ranking the
country 15th out of the 58 countries in the world, according to 2013
Resource Governance Index released by Revenue Watch Institute (RWI). Ghana’s
performances were based of mining activities in the country.
Ghana’s score was base on Institutional and Legal
Setting (79), Safeguards and Quality Controls (73), Reporting Practices (51),
Enabling Environment (59) and Sub-national Transfer (69).
Ghana earned a satisfactory score of 79 on the
product of sub-stantial disclosure policies and an evolving legal framework.
According to the index, in 2012 the Ministry of
Minerals, Lands and Natural Resources announced reforms to introduce
competitive auctions for mineral licenses. ‘Environmental impact assessments
are required prior to licensing, but the results are confidential,’ said the
index.
It also noted that the Large Taxpayer Unit of the
Ghana Revenue Authority collects all taxes from mining companies; taxes on
dividends are collected by a separate unit of the Finance Ministry. ‘The
collecting agencies use some mining revenues in their own budgets rather than
depositing them in the treasury,’ according to the index.
The index states that Ghana is a signatory to the
Extractive Industries Transparency Initiative (EITI) and achieved compliant
status in 2010. A Freedom of Information Bill has been dormant in Parliament
since 2010.
‘The government does not publish comprehensive
information on most key aspects of the mining industry, resulting in a partial
score of 51,’ according to the index.
It also said that information on applications for
mining concessions is available for a fee, but there is no clear explanation of
licensing criteria, adding that mining contracts are not published and it is
difficult to evaluate the actual fiscal terms that apply to companies. However,
many oil contracts are available on government websites. Some mining companies
voluntarily publish their environmental impact assessments.
Ghana received a satisfactory score of 73, on a
product of anti-corruption policies but lack of assertive government oversight.
The Resources Governance Index revealed that
inadequate resources mean that legislators rarely fulfill the requirement to
ratify all mining contacts. ‘Members of Parliament from the ruling party are
often appointed to the boards on mining companies, giving legislators a
personal stake in the industry despite laws prohibiting conflicts of interest,’
said the index.
The index made it clear that audit mechanisms are
weak in Ghana and no reports specific to extractive revenues are published,
despite Ghana Audit Office reviews government agencies financial statements and
reports to Parliament.
The country also received a partial score of 59,
reflecting less-than-satisfactory rankings on measurements of government
accountability, transparency, and the rule of law.
The index also accused the central government
transfers resource revenue to local authorities, saying that it only transfer
revenues after merging them with other revenues in a Common Fund for Local
Authorities. Information on distributions from the common fund is published in
local government budgets, available by request from local governments or the
Interior Ministry. However, the rules that determine the allocations are not
available.
Comments
Post a Comment