After
over 10 years of objecting to obnoxious demands by the European Union in the
Economic Partnership Agreement (EPAs) negotiations, ECOWAS, last week, suddenly
reversed its position and made serious and incomprehensible concessions to the
EU.
The
ECOWAS Commission has also adopted a speedy process starting with a hastily
agreed meeting of chief negotiators in Brussels on February 6th. For the first
time, the EPA process will now exclude the technical experts, civil society and
the private sector in the Region, in order to rush through finalization and
signing of the agreement in a matter of days.
On
the content of the negotiations, a market access offer of 75% liberalization
was arrived at only after sacrificing manufacturers in Ghana and the West
Africa Region at large. This targets goods such as textiles, aluminium,
insecticides, cement, soap and detergents, wire and metals, pharmaceuticals.
These constitute the heart of Ghana’s manufacturing sector and are
crucial for any meaningful industrial development.
Yet,
ECOWAS Negotiators deemed them as unworthy of support and specifically
sacrificed their national and regional markets for European goods. This almost
certainly signifies the demise of domestic light manufacturing with the
loss of thousands of factories, hundreds of thousands of jobs and most of all
the prospects of industrialisation and developmental transformation of the
economies of West Africa.
This
agreement also insists that Europe is entitled to whatever favourable trade and
economic terms ECOWAS enters into with other countries whose economic
structures have more than 10% share of manufacturing. This effectively makes
EUROPE a member of ECOWAS and therefore gravelly undermines any meaningful
South-South cooperation and integrated developmental regionalism in Africa.
Sadly,
West Africa has also conceded to forgo its tariff revenue in return for
promised aid by the EU. Revenues to be forgone are even more than the uncertain
aid. Ghana’s annual tax revenue of over $300 million dollars (USD) per
year, estimated by the Economic Commission for Africa (ECA), will be forgone.
The
Ghana government’s own figures, publicized by the Ministry of Trade and
Industry, put the country’s net tax losses at a lower but still ‘gargantuan’
figure of about $160 million annually. The region as a whole stands to
lose $1.8billion annually in import tax revenues. In return the EU promises 6.5
billion Euros for the whole region over a period of five years.
Worst
of all, EPA also requires that within six months of conclusion,
negotiations must begin to extend this draconian regime from one that covers
trade in goods into a treaty governing almost every other aspect of economic
activity and policy decision-making in West Africa.
This
means Europe will now co-determine and make gains from financial services and
financial policy in areas such as current account and capital account
management; all other service sectors; technology policy and intellectual
property, including traditional knowledge and genetic resources; personal data
protection and use; competition and investment and government procurement. This
is an attack on national sovereignty.
Regrettably,
authorities in West Africa have been complicit and contributed directly or
indirectly to the present brink. In the case of Ghana, its Interim EPA which it
initialed in 2007 has served as constant pressure on the rest of the region.
Ghana
showed neither conviction nor strategic vision in its failure to decommission
the weapon that her IEPA provided to the EU. Having belatedly rejoined a by
then undermined and weakened regional process it appears to have shown little
or no leadership in propelling the long term developmental needs of her
peoples.
Now,
it is incumbent that the Government of Ghana redeems the interests of its
peoples.
In
the light of the above we CSOs in Ghana unequivocally condemn the EPAs
processes, which exclude the private sector, CSOs and even the experts. We also
condemn the content of the agreement which will wipe out jobs in the
manufacturing sector, deprive our countries of national revenue and makes
nonsense of sovereignty.
We
therefore call on the Government of Ghana to stop the signing and ratification
of this agreement immediately. As CSOs and other development experts have
repeatedly pointed out there are real developmental alternatives to the EPA.
We
also call on the citizens and all other groups in Ghana to call on the
Government to save the Country from going down this lane of permanent economic
doom.
Issued by ECONOMIC
JUSTICE NETWORK (EJN), GHANA
Comments
Post a Comment